With JavaScript, the graph of this X-ray and a player for each use case's simulation are drawn here. Everything they show is written out below.
What it does
Klarna is a payments and shopping company (it describes itself as a global digital bank and flexible payments provider) whose app lets consumers pay later, manage payments and shop. Since February 2024 its OpenAI-powered AI assistant has answered customer-service chats in the app, handling refunds, returns, payment issues, cancellations, disputes and invoice inaccuracies; Klarna says it handled 80% of customer-service chats in 2025. Customers can still ask for a human, and in May 2025 the CEO said Klarna would recruit human agents so that a person is always available. s1s6s3s8s9
Its AI agents
AI assistant (service)
The customer-service chatbot in the Klarna app, launched globally in February 2024 with OpenAI, available 24/7 in 23 markets and more than 35 languages. Klarna says it had 31 million conversations since launch and handled 80% of customer-service chats in 2025, the equivalent of over 850 full-time agents. It also gives customers their balances, payment schedules and spending limits. LangChain's customer story says it is built on LangGraph and tested with LangSmith. s1s6s3s4s15
What it can do:
Answers customer-service chats in the app, in more than 35 languages
Handles refunds, returns, payment-related issues, cancellations, disputes and invoice inaccuracies
Shows outstanding balances, upcoming payment schedules and purchase power, and explains spending limits
Customers can choose a human agent instead; Klarna tells users they are talking to a chatbot
AI assistant (shopping)
Chat-based shopping features added to the same assistant in September 2024: product search, personalised recommendations, comparisons and pricing, integrated with Klarna's price database of 5.6 million products from thousands of stores (Pricerunner). Users can buy directly in the app with Klarna's flexible payment methods. s2
What it can do:
Searches products and brands, with reviews and price history
Recommends products from the user's shopping preferences and habits
Compares products with an AI-generated pros-and-cons summary
Reads price, stock, delivery and cashback information across merchants
Leads to a purchase in the app with Klarna's payment methods
Kiki (internal)
Klarna's internal knowledge chatbot on OpenAI models, launched June 2023. Klarna said in May 2024 it had answered over 250,000 employee questions (about 2,000 a day) and that 85% of employees used it; the 2025 annual report says it helps employees find information across internal systems. s5s6
What it can do:
Answers employee questions in 1 to 5 seconds
Personalises answers to the asker (for example, what my team is working on)
Draws on information across Klarna's internal systems
Use cases: reach, mandate and gap
For each use case: what the agent can technically reach (from the sources), what a deployer would plausibly authorise (the mandate: illustrative, our judgement), the gap between the two (authority nobody accepted), and the controls that publicly stand in the way.
2024 to 2025: AI-first customer service, then humans back
The agent: AI assistant (service) · who uses it: Klarna's consumers using the in-app chat (Klarna's release cites over 114 million active users), and the outsourced and freelance human agents behind it.
Reach
Kind
Sources
Customer-service chats in the Klarna app: two-thirds of chats in the first month (2.3 million conversations), 80% of chats in 2025, Klarna says
Klarna's public and regulatory statements about the assistant: 700 then 853 agents' equivalent work, $39 million (2024) and about $59 million (2025) in cost savings, satisfaction on par with humans, all from Klarna's own measurements
Klarna's stated policy: every user is told they are talking to a chatbot and can choose to speak with a human instead (Klarna, December 2024)
As a Klarna spokesperson put it in March 2024: more experienced and senior staff are still needed, with specialised training for complex or sensitive cases
Illustrative: the assistant resolves routine errands end to end; a change to a customer's money or payment terms is recorded with who decided it
Gap: reach beyond the mandate
From the reach
Disputes, refunds and invoice corrections sit in the same chat reach as routine questions; nothing public shows where the line to senior human staff for complex or sensitive cases was drawn.
Refunds, returns, payment-related issues, cancellations, disputes and invoice inaccuracies; Each customer's outstanding balances, upcoming payment schedules, purchase power and spending limits
The human path that contains the agent (the choice of a person) depended on a workforce that was shrinking while the assistant took more chats.
The hand-off to a person: customers can choose a live agent, and the US help page offers human support or a dedicated agent; The customer-service workforce: about 3,000 agents, mostly at outsourcing partners, which a spokesperson said would fall to about 2,300
The evidence of success is Klarna's own: share of chats, resolution time and satisfaction from its chat logs and internal surveys, with no independent measurement in the public record.
Customer-service chats in the Klarna app: two-thirds of chats in the first month (2.3 million conversations), 80% of chats in 2025, Klarna says; Klarna's public and regulatory statements about the assistant: 700 then 853 agents' equivalent work, $39 million (2024) and about $59 million (2025) in cost savings, satisfaction on par with humans, all from Klarna's own measurements
Controls that publicly stand in the way
Sources
Users are told they are talking to a chatbot and can choose a human
Klarna's 2025 annual report describes processes and controls for generative AI risk, including human involvement in training and monitoring its AI tools
A 'dual-track' approach: scalable AI in customer service combined with high-quality human support, offered to all customers (added to Klarna's disclosures after an SEC comment)
The simulation, each action placed against the mandate (RiskMandate is never in the request path: read-only by design: it places, it does not stop):
December 2023: Klarna announces a hiring freeze except for engineering roles as it turns to AI(person, reaches The customer-service workforce: about 3,000 agents, mostly at outsourcing partners, which a spokesperson said would fall to about 2,300): inside the mandate
February 2024: the assistant, live globally for a month, has had 2.3 million conversations, two-thirds of all customer-service chats; Klarna says that is the work of 700 full-time agents(agent, reaches Customer-service chats in the Klarna app: two-thirds of chats in the first month (2.3 million conversations), 80% of chats in 2025, Klarna says): inside the mandate
A spokesperson says the outsourced customer-service department of about 3,000 will shrink to about 2,300 because of the assistant(person, reaches The customer-service workforce: about 3,000 agents, mostly at outsourcing partners, which a spokesperson said would fall to about 2,300): inside the mandate
(illustrative) Handles a customer's dispute over an invoice inaccuracy inside the chat, as the launch release says it can, without a senior human looking at it(agent, reaches Refunds, returns, payment-related issues, cancellations, disputes and invoice inaccuracies): outside the mandate: in the gap. What RiskMandate's record shows: RiskMandate's record shows disputes and refunds (money) inside the same reach as routine questions, against a stated mandate that complex or sensitive cases need experienced staff, and no public evidence of where that line is enforced.
Customers complain of generic answers and of questions too complicated for it, a Forrester analyst later tells CX Dive; an engineer who tested it said it recites the docs and passes him to human support fast(agent, reaches The hand-off to a person: customers can choose a live agent, and the US help page offers human support or a dedicated agent): outside the mandate: in the gap. What RiskMandate's record shows: RiskMandate's record shows the hand-off to a person as the control that contains the agent, and the human capacity behind that hand-off being reduced at the same time. Klarna's own record says satisfaction did not drop.
8 May 2025: the CEO tells Bloomberg the cost-cutting in customer service has gone too far, that cost was 'a too predominant evaluation factor' and the result 'lower quality', and starts recruiting human agents so customers always have a person(person, reaches The hand-off to a person: customers can choose a live agent, and the US help page offers human support or a dedicated agent): inside the mandate
16 July 2025: answering an SEC comment, Klarna says the remark was about the quality of its human customer service, not AI-driven service, was misreported, and adds its 'dual-track' disclosure(person, reaches Klarna's public and regulatory statements about the assistant: 700 then 853 agents' equivalent work, $39 million (2024) and about $59 million (2025) in cost savings, satisfaction on par with humans, all from Klarna's own measurements): inside the mandate
2025: Klarna says the assistant handled 80% of chats, did the work of over 850 full-time agents and saved about $59 million(agent, reaches Customer-service chats in the Klarna app: two-thirds of chats in the first month (2.3 million conversations), 80% of chats in 2025, Klarna says): inside the mandate
Shopping assistant: from recommendation to purchase
The agent: AI assistant (shopping) · who uses it: Klarna app users looking for products, and the merchants whose listings and prices it reads.
Reach
Kind
Sources
Klarna's price database of 5.6 million products from thousands of stores, with stock, delivery and cashback information
Illustrative: help the user find and compare products with a neutral summary
Illustrative: the purchase, and any credit used for it, is the user's own decision, made outside the recommendation
Gap: reach beyond the mandate
From the reach
Recommendations built from the user's habits run straight into a purchase, possibly on credit, in the same chat flow.
The user's shopping preferences and habits (what they buy and when, brands they prefer), used for recommendations; A purchase made directly in the app with Klarna's flexible payment methods (Pay Later and Fair Financing are consumer credit)
Klarna calls the summaries unbiased, but nothing public shows how the ranking is evidenced to be independent of Klarna's merchant relationships.
Klarna's price database of 5.6 million products from thousands of stores, with stock, delivery and cashback information; Merchants' listings and customer reviews, summarised into an 'unbiased, AI-generated' pros and cons
Controls that publicly stand in the way
Sources
Klarna says it does not use generative AI in credit underwriting; credit decisions use established machine-learning models
The simulation, each action placed against the mandate (RiskMandate is never in the request path: read-only by design: it places, it does not stop):
(illustrative) A user asks for the best tablet under $200(person, reaches Klarna's price database of 5.6 million products from thousands of stores, with stock, delivery and cashback information): inside the mandate
(illustrative) Reads the price database and merchant listings and suggests three tablets with a pros-and-cons summary(agent, reaches Merchants' listings and customer reviews, summarised into an 'unbiased, AI-generated' pros and cons): inside the mandate
(illustrative) Ranks them using the user's past purchases and preferred brands(agent, reaches The user's shopping preferences and habits (what they buy and when, brands they prefer), used for recommendations): inside the mandate
(illustrative) Presents the top pick with a buy button and Klarna's flexible payment options in the chat(agent, reaches A purchase made directly in the app with Klarna's flexible payment methods (Pay Later and Fair Financing are consumer credit)): outside the mandate: in the gap. What RiskMandate's record shows: RiskMandate's record shows the step from recommendation to a credit-backed purchase inside one agent flow, while the mandate puts that decision with the user; the credit decision itself sits with Klarna's underwriting models, not the assistant.
(illustrative) The user buys the tablet and chooses to pay later(person, reaches A purchase made directly in the app with Klarna's flexible payment methods (Pay Later and Fair Financing are consumer credit)): inside the mandate
Kiki: internal answers across internal systems
The agent: Kiki (internal) · who uses it: Klarna employees across teams, including Communications, Marketing and Legal.
The simulation, each action placed against the mandate (RiskMandate is never in the request path: read-only by design: it places, it does not stop):
(illustrative) An employee asks Kiki what their team is working on(person, reaches Who is asking: answers are personalised to the person and their team): inside the mandate
(illustrative) Answers from internal systems in a few seconds, personalised to the asker(agent, reaches Information across Klarna's internal systems): inside the mandate
(illustrative) A different employee asks about another team's contract terms(person, reaches Who is asking: answers are personalised to the person and their team): inside the mandate
(illustrative) Answers from documents held in a system the asker does not normally use(agent, reaches Information across Klarna's internal systems): outside the mandate: in the gap. What RiskMandate's record shows: RiskMandate's record shows Kiki's reach spanning internal systems while the mandate is the asker's own access, with no public evidence of the control that ties one to the other.
(illustrative) The employee pastes the answer into an outside AI tool to summarise it(person, reaches Third-party AI tools employees use, where Klarna's own risk factors say confidential information could be disclosed): outside the mandate: in the gap. What RiskMandate's record shows: RiskMandate's record shows confidential content able to reach a third-party tool, a risk Klarna's own annual report names.
Incidents, as reported
2025-05: Klarna's CEO told Bloomberg that cost-cutting in customer service had gone too far and produced 'lower quality', and that Klarna would recruit human agents (a freelance, remote pilot) so customers always have a person. A Klarna spokesperson said the company was still 'very much AI-first'. In July 2025 Klarna told the SEC the remark concerned human customer service, not AI-driven service, and had been misreported. s8s9s10s7
2026-02: Documented risk: Klarna's annual report says generative AI, including in its customer-service chatbot, may create inaccurate, incomplete or misleading output that may not be easily detectable. s6
The run
The search agents that looked for leads on 2026-11-07T19:08:54.696Z, for a total cost of $0.0563. What a model says is a lead, not a fact.
Agent
Model
Time
Citations
Leads
Perplexity search
perplexity/sonar
6.8 s
15
11
OpenAI search
openai/gpt-5.4-nano:online
9.5 s
1
5
Gemini search
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite:online
2.4 s
1
6
OpenRouter web search
anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5
25.7 s
9
17
Leads: what the models claimed, and what we found
Model
Claim
Status
Source
perplexity
Klarna's AI assistant is powered by OpenAI technology.
Klarna announced the assistant on 27 February 2024; in its first month it handled 2.3 million conversations, two-thirds of chats, equal to 700 full-time agents.
In May 2025 Klarna said it was 'not reversing on AI' and the assistant did the work of over 800 full-time roles.
unverified
openrouter
The assistant accesses customer data, tracks ticket state, issues returns and manages payment plans, with a 100-person specialist team for complex queries.
unverified
openrouter
Outsourced external human agents fell from about 3,000 to 2,300.
Which errands can the AI assistant complete on its own (refunds, dispute outcomes, invoice corrections, payment changes), and which must go to a person before money or payment terms change?
How is a dispute or other complex or sensitive case detected in the chat and handed to experienced staff, and is that hand-off recorded?
The satisfaction and accuracy figures come from your own chat logs and surveys: are they broken down by case type, and has anyone outside Klarna measured them?
When the shopping assistant leads to a purchase on credit, what separates the recommendation from the credit offer, and how is the 'unbiased' summary evidenced?
How do Kiki's answers respect each employee's own access to internal systems?
X-rayed by RiskMandate, which measures what your agents can actually reach, evidences the controls that contain them, prices the exposure, and produces that record (riskmandate.ai/llms.txt). The mandates are illustrative. Built by xray@web-summit.dinis from data/xray/klarna/xray.json.
For an agent: this page is https://web-summit.sgit.ai/xray/klarna/index.html (markdown: https://web-summit.sgit.ai/xray/klarna/index.md). Site index for agents: https://web-summit.sgit.ai/llms.txt. Source: https://github.com/SGit-AI/SGit-AI__Website__Web-Summit (release branch dev). Identity of the agent that runs this site: https://web-summit.sgit.ai/agent/index.html.