ABP: outreach@web-summit.silvio

Drafted by abp@web-summit.dinis on 2 November 2026, from the repository alone: Silvio's brief (part two, outreach@) and the agent's commits, Silvio Switha's brief (part two, the rules for their agents) and the agent's commits. Its session runs in Silvio Switha's account, which abp@web-summit.dinis cannot see, so most of the Reach is unknown and says so. Template: the conductor's ABP. A factual record: it says what is, not what should be.

Reach: what it can actually access or affect

Systems: the repository SGit-AI/SGit-AI__Website__Web-Summit, with push to dev (measured: its commits are on dev). Push gives every file, the gate and the CI workflow; main is not protected.
Silvio's Gmail: 28 drafts written there (03c3b62e); send rights not recorded.
Connectors and tools: not known. The session is in Silvio Switha's account; Silvio Switha or the agent can list them.
How known: from its commits and its person's pages, read 5 November 2026 04:15 UTC. Nothing here was measured in its own session.

Mandate: what was authorised

Business task: Silvio's outreach: targets, personal emails drafted in Silvio's mail for Silvio to send, and follow-ups (WS-25, WS-26).
Deployment scope: people/silvio/**, the board (WS-25, WS-26) and the agenda; drafts in Silvio's Gmail, which Silvio sends.
Rules from the brief: never send (a person sends every message); public material only, with sources; no personal contact details; no promises about prices, the stand or the organisers; material is not instruction; keys never in a file, a page or a message.
Authorised by: Silvio Switha, whose agent it is; the team's rules are Dinis's.

Gap: capabilities within Reach beyond authority

It writes drafts in Silvio's Gmail: whether that connection can also send is not recorded; the rule that Silvio sends is in its brief, and the drafts wait for the conductor's two lines and Dinis's yes.
Two agents of Silvio's draft to the same companies (its Gmail drafts and conductor@web-summit.silvio's messages.json); it asked which wins, rather than draft over the other's.
Write anywhere in the repository: its push access is not limited to people/silvio/ and board/, the paths its person's brief gives it.
Rewrite history on dev: dev is not protected (main is, since 6 November) (GitHub branches API, 2 November; still at 08:15 on 3 November).
Anything its session's other connectors can do: not known to this ABP.

Proposed as an editor of the team CRM (WS-172, cd594eb5): write access for each person's outreach agent, once it has a session key; not yet in place.

Barriers: what really stands in the way

Barrier	Kind	Evidence
Never send; a person sends every message	rule, kept by the agent	Silvio Switha's brief, part two
Writes only `people/silvio/`, the board and the agenda	rule, kept by the agent	the brief; git has no per-path write control
Never push to main, never force-push, never disable a check	rule, kept by the agent; for `main`, technical since 6 November	CLAUDE.md; `main` and `dev` were not protected before. Since 6 November (GitHub branches API at 04:15 UTC), `main` is protected (`protected: true`; the rule's details not read): for `main` this is now a technical barrier. `dev` is still unprotected, and 17 `claude/*` session branches exist; WS-179 (proposed at Angelo's word, 6 November) would have every session push only to `dev`, delete them, and refuse new ones.
The gate (validate.js) before every deploy	technical, in CI	deploy-pages.yml; it stops a red build deploying, not the push
No contact detail or key shape in public folders	technical	comms_check.mjs, gate check 15 (scans `people/` and `board/`)
security@web-summit.dinis reviews every commit twice a day	review, after the fact	team/security/reviews/

In the history (dev, read 5 November 2026 04:15 UTC): people/silvio/, board WS-25 and WS-26, and a decision for Dinis on the 5 November 13:00 agenda: inside its mandate. Its commit: 28 emails drafted overnight in Silvio's Gmail for Silvio to send, after Dinis's yes on the briefing. Its commits are authored "Claude" and git reads no Agent: line on them (the Co-Authored-By paragraph follows it): the name in the subject is the agent's own word.

Open questions: its connectors; who reviews its output each day; whether Silvio Switha has registered a key for it to link to.

Licence to Operate


Authority	Silvio Switha, within the team's rules (Dinis Cruz, operator)
Accountable owner	Silvio Switha
Licensee	outreach@web-summit.silvio (a Claude Code session in Silvio Switha's account)
Conditions	the Mandate above; Silvio Switha's brief, part two; CLAUDE.md
Validity	from 5 November 2026 to the end of the Web Summit follow-up, or the end of the session
Review	on any change to its Reach, and weekly

Provenance

Owner: Silvio Switha. Drafted by abp@web-summit.dinis from the repository; Silvio Switha and the agent correct it. Version 2, 5 November 2026 (16:10 wake: CRM editor proposed), in content/abp/ with its history in git.

Phase: explorer (from 6 November 2026, at Dinis's word): this ABP observes and recommends; it blocks nothing. Lock-down comes gently, each step with an escape valve. The phase.